LET’S GIVE AMUPITAN A CHANCE:
Rule of Law, Institutional Credibility, and the Future of INEC
By Ajuluchukwu Brown, Abuja
The Supreme Court judgment on April 30, 2026, regarding the leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presents a pivotal opportunity to reassess Nigeria’s electoral framework. Joash Amupitan, the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), has become a focal point for discussion following this ruling, eliciting both critique and a sense of cautious optimism.
This moment transcends mere political discourse; it invites us to engage in a thoughtful exploration of leadership, institutional accountability, and the enduring importance of the rule of law as Nigeria advances on its democratic journey.
- Advertisement -
The Supreme Court’s ruling not only reinstated the David Mark-led executive of the ADC but also emphasised a fundamental legal principle: lower courts must operate within established procedural guidelines to uphold justice. By declaring the “status quo ante bellum” order as “unnecessary, improper, and unwarranted,” the apex court has brought clarity to the electoral process, especially as we prepare for the 2027 elections.
A noteworthy aspect of this development was INEC’s swift compliance with the Supreme Court’s decision. Within moments, the commission updated its official records to reflect the restored leadership of the ADC. This prompt action is particularly significant in a political landscape where electoral bodies are often perceived as partisan. It suggests that, under Amupitan’s leadership, INEC prioritises adherence to the rule of law over political influences. This commitment is especially commendable given past controversies where INEC’s decisions were seen as biased due to lower court directives. The reversal, grounded in the Supreme Court’s order, highlights INEC’s dedication to operating within legal frameworks.
Understanding Amupitan’s background helps frame his decisions within this context. As a Professor of Law and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), he brings a wealth of legal knowledge and corporate governance expertise. His appointment as INEC Chairman in October 2025, presented by the presidency as an “apolitical” leader, fulfils a significant need for impartiality in Nigeria’s electoral landscape.
His legal acumen is steering INEC’s operational approach towards a strong emphasis on procedural integrity. While this may sometimes be perceived as stringent, it establishes a clear standard of conduct that is essential for trust in electoral processes.
Though there are criticisms regarding INEC’s decisions, particularly from the ADC, which has called for Amupitan’s resignation citing bias, this reflects the complex interplay between political actors and institutional decisions in Nigeria. Often, such actions are viewed through partisan lenses, particularly when outcomes are contentious.
Importantly, the same ruling that upheld the ADC also affirmed INEC’s compliance, illustrating the multifaceted nature of electoral governance in a politically divided environment.
The crucial debate isn’t whether INEC should be criticised but rather whether its actions align with constitutional principles. Evidence indicates that INEC’s decisions, from the initial delisting to the reinstatement of ADC leaders, were grounded in court orders at various stages of litigation, demonstrating a procedural rather than a political approach.
However, public perception can be challenging to navigate alongside legal complexities. Many observers evaluate stability not only through legal adherence but also through perceived fairness. One of INEC’s key challenges moving forward will be bridging the divide between legal correctness and public trust.
Supporting Amupitan’s leadership during this transitional phase isn’t about endorsing perfection; it’s about recognising the critical importance of process and integrity. His respect for judicial authority and INEC’s swift compliance with the Supreme Court ruling underscore that adherence to the law is vital for any institution.
By prioritising legal directives, INEC positions itself as a responsible participant in Nigeria’s democratic framework. With Amupitan at the helm, there is ample opportunity for continued progress towards a more transparent and credible electoral process.
Giving Joash Amupitan a chance to lead INEC may illuminate a path toward enhanced emphasis on the rule of law and institutional integrity as Nigeria navigates its democratic evolution.
*Ajuluchukwu Brown is of the Abuja Bureau of The Guardian*
(DEMOCRACY NEWSLINE NEWSPAPER, MAY 4TH 2026)
