Local Government Autonomy in Nigeria: Progressive Ideal or Political Mirage?
By Dr. Aiyeku Olufemi Samuel
In the theatre of Nigerian governance, few issues are as misunderstood yet repeatedly romanticized as the notion of Local Government Autonomy. Politicians champion it. Policy papers recommend it. Citizens echo it. But have we, as a people, truly paused to ask: Is local government autonomy a practical necessity or a well-disguised policy illusion?
Let’s begin with this: Is autonomy possible for a structure that isn’t constitutionally recognized as a federating unit? In classical federalism, only the central government and the federating states constitute the pillars of governance. Local governments, by structure and origin, are creatures of the states, not independent units of federation. So, how do we autonomize what is fundamentally subordinate?
According to Section 7 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, local government councils are to exist “under a law which provides for the establishment, structure, composition, finance and functions of such councils.” This legal language further reinforces that the local government is an instrument of the state, not a parallel authority.
Yet, across political circles, “local government autonomy” has become a buzzword. It’s an emotionally persuasive slogan — much like “restructuring” — but often floats without rigorous policy interrogation. As one commentator aptly said, “We are too enamoured of highfalutin ideas and buzzwords without interrogating their practical implications.”
What exactly do we want to achieve through local government autonomy? Proponents argue that autonomy will bring governance closer to the grassroots, reduce corruption, and accelerate development. But experience contradicts this optimism. The lack of transparency and capacity at the local level has often made these councils mere cash conduits, with little to show in service delivery or accountability.
Consider this: According to National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and BudgIT data, between 2015 and 2021, over ₦15 trillion was allocated to local governments in Nigeria. Yet, 70% of rural communities still lack access to clean water, basic healthcare, and proper roads. So, where is the disconnect? Is it really a matter of autonomy, or leadership failure across all levels?
Another glaring contradiction arises: How can a system advocate for local government autonomy when it refuses to allow states the autonomy to create local councils based on their peculiar needs and demographics? Presently, for a state to create new local governments, it requires National Assembly approval — an ironic overreach that undermines true federalism. If a people in southern Kaduna need more local governance units, why should that require validation from legislators in Bayelsa or Katsina?
It begs the question: Is the call for local government autonomy genuine, or a political bargaining chip? Some argue that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s government avoided implementing full autonomy so as not to fall out with powerful state governors — key players in his re-election strategy. If this is true, it reveals a deeper crisis: Are we formulating policies for optics or for transformative change?
Let’s not forget: autonomy without accountability breeds impunity. Giving local governments full financial and administrative independence without the requisite audit structures, human capacity, and legislative oversight is like arming a child with a matchstick in a house full of gasoline.
Solutions and Recommendations:
Strengthen Fiscal Federalism: Let the federating units—states—have genuine control over local administration but within a framework of transparency and enforceable service delivery benchmarks.
Review Constitutional Framework: Remove ambiguities that create overlapping control and ensure local councils are tools for state-level service delivery, not pseudo-states.
Focus on Governance Outcomes: Rather than structure, let our priority be results. Can we build schools, provide clean water, manage waste, and ensure safety? That is what the people need.
Capacity Building at Local Level: Invest in training and development of council leaders and staff. Autonomy without competence is futility.
Implement Performance-Based Allocation: Link funding to measurable developmental milestones—not just constitutional entitlements.
As Abraham Lincoln once said, “The legitimate object of government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all or cannot do so well for themselves.” Let us not chase the illusion of autonomy while ignoring the machinery of governance.
In conclusion, the path to a better Nigeria doesn’t lie in hollow political mantras but in purposeful leadership, structural reforms, capacity development, and an unwavering focus on results. Autonomy should never be an end—it must always be a means to the higher goal of inclusive development and good governance.
#GovernanceReform #FederalismInNigeria #LocalGovernmentReality #PolicyNotPolitics #LeadershipMatters #GrassrootsDevelopment
